What follows below are the last five Principles with their related Performance Indicators. Please keep in mind that these are intended to be expectations — standards — which apply to all types of higher education libraries. Nonetheless, each library must respond to its unique user population and institutional environment.
The 2011 Standards assume that each library will identify and select Performance Indicators that are congruent with its institution’s mission and contribute to institutional effectiveness. A library may decide to create additional Performance Indicators that apply to its specific library type. For example, a research library may want to add a Performance Indicator around open access, while a Performance Indicator concerning GED support might be appropriate for a community college.
Text: Principles 5 – 9 (PDF)
Are there Performance Indicators, generally applicable to all types of higher education libraries, which should be added to what’s above? Is the relationship between the Principles and the Performance Indicators clear and intuitive?