Skip to Content
|
Skip to Table of Contents
Welcome to the CommentPress site for “Cultural Proficiencies for Racial Equity: A Framework,” created by the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), ALA Office for Diversity, Literacy and Outreach Services (ODLOS); Public Library Association (PLA); and Association of Research Libraries (ARL) Building Cultural Proficiencies for Racial Equity Framework Task Force.
Use the table of contents menu, or the navigational arrows at the top and bottom of each page, to browse the draft Framework.
The comment period has closed. The task force thanks you for your feedback. Comments on the draft version will help shape the final version of the Framework.
Source: https://acrl.ala.org/RacialEquityFramework/
Just combining race with equity isn’t going to get us to a good place. This is several steps backward! Race is a social construction. To paraphrase Lorde who wrote so astutely, you cannot dismantle the master’s house by using his tools! Stop racializing and minoritizing people – this is a “white supremacy” tactic. Find new language. We were doing so well with the language of cultural competencies and diversity. Why have we regressed to prioritizing race again? Ethnicity is more common in most parts of the world and we know that human differences are nuanced even in the racial/cultural sphere because of intermarriage and migration. By continuing to fixate on race without considering these multiple identities and the true nature of disadvantaged populations, we’re just exporting racism! This sort of a framework is American exceptionalism. How does this make sense in a nation of 330 million with about 12% non-monolithic African Americans ,>13% foreign born?
It is unclear how this document relates to the ACRL 2012 Cultural Competencies document. Does the 2012 document still stand? I hope so. ACRL 2012 is a model of clear and effective communication. It demonstrates strong alignment with core library values as articulated in the Library Bill of Rights and Freedom to Read Statement. This Framework is not such a clear communication. It seems to challenge the legitimacy of those values – fundamentally. If the two worldviews are intended to peacefully co-exist within librarianship, it won’t work; they are utterly incompatible.